The Case Briefs Project is a new online publication of the Federal Circuit Bar Journal intended to provide Journal members with an opportunity to engage with Federal Circuit jurisprudence and to publish written work outside of the student Note context. Additionally, the case briefs provide members of the Federal Circuit Bar Association with an additional resource to stay current with legal developments in their field. The Case Briefs Project focuses on an objective synthesis of the cases organized according to the traditional case brief format: Statement of Facts, Procedural History, Questions Presented, Holding, Reasoning, and Concurring/Dissenting Opinions. Have a request? Please submit a case brief request using this form.
Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 822 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
CSIRO v. CISCO Systems, Inc., 809 F.3d 1295 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Hicks v. MSPB, 819 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 786 F.3d 983 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co. v. United States, 822 F.3d 1289 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
DOW Chemical Co. v. NOVA Chemicals Corp., 809 F.3d 1223 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Ramona Two Shields v. United States, 820 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products, 807 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, 793 F.3d 1268 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp., 773 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Wi-LAN USA, Inc. v. Apple Inc., 830 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Rapid Litigation Management Ltd v. CellzDirect, Inc., 827 F.3d 1042 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Amgen Manufacturing Limited v. Apotex Inc., 827 F.3d 1052 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Cahill v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 821 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Hopi Tribe v. United States, 782 F.3d 662 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Avid Technology, Inc. v. Harmonic, Inc., 815 F.3d 1040 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Ford Motor Co. v. United States, 811 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2016)